Home Remote Patient Monitoring Shifts Toward Disease-Specific Solutions and Enhanced Patient Engagement, Highlights from Recent IPO Filing

Remote Patient Monitoring Shifts Toward Disease-Specific Solutions and Enhanced Patient Engagement, Highlights from Recent IPO Filing

Jan 02, 2016 08:00 CST Updated 08:00

As the current healthcare payment model shifts toward value-based care, healthcare institutions are increasingly interested in evaluating and adopting remote patient monitoring platforms. They are particularly interested in platforms that facilitate collaboration between hospitals and patients to jointly manage chronic diseases within the framework of population health strategies.

According to a study led by Spyglass Consulting Group, approximately 66% of healthcare organizations have deployed remote patient monitoring programs. This represents a significant increase compared to the group’s first report issued in 2013. Furthermore, the report indicates that hospitals are interested in far more than just technology; they seek to gain a better understanding of patients’ health, enabling physicians to proactively identify deteriorating conditions before scheduled appointments.
Spyglass surveyed 100 healthcare organizations, including service delivery systems of multiple hospitals, independent community hospitals, emergency care systems, home healthcare providers, and government agencies.

The survey shows that more than 80% of respondents have already used mobile devices and tablets, enabling patients with chronic diseases to be discharged from the hospital as soon as possible. The breakthrough achievements are shown in the following table (the proportion of medical institutions using remote technology to treat diseases):

Congenital Heart Disease in Children: 96%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: 82%
Diabetes: 71%
Hypertension: 49%


In an interview, Gregg Malkary, Managing Director of Spyglass Consulting Group, stated, “We have interviewed several organizations that have comprehensive healthcare measures in place, but many others are still struggling to develop their healthcare strategies.” He added, “Technology still needs further optimization. Currently, remote monitoring accounts for a significant portion of patient care. In the long run, hospitals aim to increase patient engagement in treatment, and they believe that remote monitoring holds great potential for managing patient health beyond the traditional hospital walls.”

Other research findings shared by Malkary:

1 Hospitals have taken an interest in wearable devices equipped with their own radar sensors, but significant hype remains, and it is unclear how many patients with chronic diseases are actually using these devices. Most activity-tracking sensors have sparked controversy due to uncertainties and the difficulty in identifying genuine users. However, many hospitals hope to see improvements in the future, as this is where the true value of these devices lies.

2. Hospitals regard remote monitoring as one of the big data trends to support more extensive strategic analytics in the future.

3. In clinical trials, hospitals and healthcare systems are striving to provide patients with remote monitoring devices (e.g., tablets) to minimize their administrative costs as much as possible. They are gradually scaling up these initiatives.

4. Hospitals’ implementation of remote patient monitoring remains in its early stages. However, this is an inevitable trend, and healthcare institutions are eager to follow suit and seek transformation.

Translation: Liu Jianqiu

Responsible Editor: Zhang Nan